Posts Tagged ‘Utah’

Cleaning Not Enough To File A Mechanics Lien in Utah

Just a week or two ago, I published a “Scenario” post, analyzing whether a lien can be filed by cleaning services or someone doing cleaning work on a construction project:  Scenario: Can You File A Mechanics Lien For Cleaning Services.

Coincidentally, the Utah Court of Appeals published a bit about this topic at the exact time we were talking about it here.  And insofar as Utah is concerned, the answer to the question is no, cleaning services (of any type) doesn’t qualify you for a lien.

Kudos to Olsen, Skoubye & Nielson’s news page for publishing about this case last week, in a cleverly titled post: In Order To Lien You Have To Do More Than Clean.  The case is All Clean, Inc. dba The Flood Co. v. Timberline Properties, 2011 UT App. 370.

The court’s reasoning circles around the big picture issue of what constitutes an improvement.  While every state has its own parlance, determining whether a company’s service qualifies them to file a mechanics lien always boils down to whether the work was or was not part of an “improvement” to the property.  After all, the idea behind a mechanics lien (as explored in our History of the Mechanics Lien post) is that the lien gives folks in the construction industry a right in the property equal to their contribution, so the owner cannot be enriched on the contribution until the constructor or supplier is paid.

But, what if the property isn’t improved…has the owner been enriched?  Should the contractor or supplier be entitled to use the property as security when its contribution didn’t improve it in any way?

In Utah, the Court of Appeals reasoned no:

All Clean asserts that we must construe the term “improvement” more broadly to include betterments of any kind, whether or not “affixed” to the premises…[But] the word “improvement” in the mechanics’ lien context does not refer simply to any work that makes the premises better. Rather, “improvement” is a legal term that has been construed to connote physical affixation and enduring change to premises in a manner that adds value. See 56 C.J.S. Mechanics’ Liens § 18 (2007).

Considering this case, it will be very difficult for cleaning services in Utah to ever avail themselves of the mechanics lien laws, as it would be difficult for a cleaning service to ever show a “physical affixation and enduring change to [a] premises.”  This isn’t to say cleaning services aren’t lienable elsewhere…

Posted in:     Lien Law Alerts  /  Tags: , , ,   /   Leave a comment

New Utah Mechanics Lien Laws Take Effect Today, August 1, 2011

Earlier this year, we posted about some substantial changes to Utah’s mechanic lien laws.  The new regulations amend and revise the existing mechanic lien laws in Utah to provide for the following big picture changes:

  • There is now a right to lien for “preconstruction services,” which are services that are performed in anticipation of construction;
  • To preserve the right to file a “preconstruction lien,” the new law creates a “Notice of Retention,” which acts like a preliminary notice for these services, and must be filed within 20 days of first furnishing preconstruction services to a project.
  • Preliminary notices are now always required on Utah projects (state and private) regardless of whether a notice of commencement is or is not properly filed.
  • Any agreement to waive lien rights before payment is now void.
  • Lien Priority of mechanics liens over mortgages and construction loans is strengthened.

A more detailed analysis of the lien law changes is found in our blog post from May 2011, when we discussed each change in detail:  Changes to Utah Mechanic Lien Laws Take Effect August 1, 2011.

This is an alert that the new Utah lien laws are now in effect.

Posted in:     Lien Law Alerts  /  Tags:   /   Leave a comment

Changes to Utah Mechanic Lien Laws Take Effect August 1, 2011

As the world turns, mechanic’s lien laws are changed by legislatures across the country.  On average, at least five substantial changes occur each year across the country, and this year, the state of Utah’s number has been called. The legislature has passed two bills that modifies mechanics lien laws, with the majority of these changes to take effect starting August 1, 2011. This post summarizes those changes.

Full text of lien law revision bills:

Utah Legislature HB0115:  Mechanic Lien Amendments (pdf) (html)
Utah Legislature HB0260: Mechanic Lien Revisions (pdf) (html)

A New Category of Liens:  Preconstruction Liens

One substantial change to Utah’s lien laws is the creation of a new category of work that qualifies for mechanic lien filings:  “Pre-Construction Services.” Utah Code 38-1-2 was amended to create this new definition of services and liens:

(13) “Preconstruction service”:
(a) means to plan or design, or to assist in the planning or design of, an improvement or a proposed improvement: (i) before construction of the improvement commences; and (ii) for compensation separate from any compensation paid or to be paid for construction service for the improvement; and
(b) includes consulting, conducting a site investigation or assessment, programming,preconstruction cost or quantity estimating, preconstruction scheduling, performing a preconstruction construction feasibility review, procuring construction services, and preparing a study, report, rendering, model, boundary or topographic survey, plat, map, design, plan, drawing, specification, or contract document.

Any party who provides such “preconstruction services” will now have the right to file a lien against the property for these services even if work never is performed on the property. While this may seem a small change at first glance, it’s pretty significant when you consider the purposes of mechanic lien laws.

As discussed in our Short History of the Mechanic Lien post, a construction participant is given a privilege in property based on work or materials incorporated into an improvement. While there are always exceptions, this incorporation requirement has been a primary consideration in lien laws across the nation for 200 years.

Here, the “preconstruction services” creates a specific type of lien for construction type services that may never get tangibly incorporated into any property or building.  Interestingly, the U.C. 38-1-3 states that a person may claim both a preconstruction and a construction lien on the same property separately. One peculiarity that may cause problems for Utah contractors in the future is that a construction lien may include an amount claimed for preconstruction services, but a preconstruction lien may not include an amount claimed for construction services.

To claim a Preconstruction Lien, the claimant must file a “Notice of Preconstruction Lien” within 90 days after completing preconstruction services. This notice must be actually filed with the county recorder for the county where the property is located, as submitting to the State Construction Registry (SCR) is not provided by the statues. The lien notice must meet statutory requirements, and must be sent to the property owner within 30 days of filing.

Notice of Retention for Preconstruction Services

Whenever a construction participant starts performing pre-construction services, they must file a “Notice of Rentention” with the State Construction Registry within 20 days of beginning that work to preserve their right to later file a mechanic lien for these services.

The failure to file a Notice of Rention results in a complete loss of lien rights for the pre-construction services.

Preliminary Notice Almost Always Required

Prior to these 2011 amendments, subcontractors and material suppliers were excused from filing a preliminary notice if a notice of commencement was not timely filed on the project. This exception, however, has now been eliminated.  Now, unless you are an individual laborer working for wages, you must always file a preliminary notice to preserve your lien rights to file a construction services lien.

Lien Priority Clarifications

When money gets tight on a construction project, Lien Priority issues can become very important. We’ve addressed lien priority issues on this blog under the tag: Lien Priority. The most common lien priority issue is the tension between a mechanic lien filing and a construction loan or property mortgage. Which has priority over the other?

Except in a minority of jurisdictions (i.e. Virginia), the first document filed in county records is the one with priority over others. The question with mechanic’s liens is whether they are effective at the time of recording, or if they relate back to the time when the construction work began.

Prior to these Utah lien law amendments, a mechanic lien related back to the date when the lien claimant first delivered labor or materials. The rule changes effective August 1, 2011, make the rules even more favorable to the lien claimant, now relating all the way back to when construction first began on the entire project, or the date of the first filing of a preliminary notice (depending on circumstances, project type, services type, etc.).  While there are some complications here that affect which priority date sticks, the big-picture change is that the lien priority date is earlier than previously provided.

Restriction on Waiving Lien Rights

Some states allow contractors or suppliers to waive their right to lien before they ever begin work, or before they get paid. Other states prohibit this. We wrote about this situation previously on this blog.  With the new Utah lien law revisions, Utah joins the states that prohibit lien waivers before payment.  The new provision specifically provides:

38-1-29. No waiver of rights — Exception — Payment applied first to preconstruction service lien.

(1) (a) A right or privilege under this chapter may not be waived or limited by contract.(b) A provision of a contract purporting to waive or limit a right or privilege under this chapter is void.

Subscribe to our Feed to Monitor Lien Law Changes

Whenever lien laws are changed across the country, we post about them and throw the post into our “Lien Law Alerts” category. The state affected by the lien law change is tagged with the state name (in this case, Utah).  If you’d like to monitor these law changes, you can subscribe to the category feed, the applicable tag feed, or the blog’s general feed.  It’s a great way to get free updates on lien law changes across the country.

Plus, since keeping up with lien law changes across the country is hard, this presents another reason why it’s smart to outsource your preliminary notice and mechanic lien work to a company like Zlien, who monitors the nuances of lien laws. For more reasons why you should use a service like Zlien, check out this blog post:  Why You Shouldn’t Use Do-It-Yourself Mechanic Lien and Notice Forms.

Posted in:     Lien Law Alerts  /  Tags: , , , , , , ,   /   4 Comments

Is Utah’s SCR (State Construction Registry) A Model For Rest of States?

Since 2005, Utah has maintained a standardized, state-wide system for filing preliminary notices, notices of commencement and notices of completion – the State Construction Registry, or SCR.  The result?  Any supplier, contractor or other interested party can log into the system, search for a project, and know exactly when it started and begun, and who is working on it.

This is a huge time-saver for folks working on construction projects in Utah.   We know the frustration contractors and suppliers have in other states, because we experience them ourselves at Zlien.

The property records offices in counties across the country can be an absolute mess.   Sometimes, its next to impossible for a subcontractor or supplier to locate the legal proeprty description for a parcel of land, the name of the property owner, and whether anything has been filed on the project.  Even though its incredibly hard to find this information, the contractor or supplier may still be responsible to know it.

Imagine if across the country this information was inputted into standardized online registry of construction projects?   That’s how things work in Utah.

In and out of Utah, one of the most compelling selling features of the Zlien service is that we make things simple for you.  After all, running your construction or supply business is difficult enough that you shouldn’t have to be research experts, or monitor lien and notice requirements across the 50 states.  How is this for simple:  You give us the project details, and our staff researches the property owner and the legal property description for you.

This can save your company hours, and since we’re more experienced at searching for this data, our search results are reliable.

Even thought the information is more accessible in Utah, that doesn’t nullify our utility.  You give us the project information, and we do the leg work.   Forget about spending an hour or two figuring out the SCR system, or having to followup with the city, or having to verify information by doing research online.

Zlien is the smarter way to lien, and we guarantee it.

Posted in:     Lien Management, Our Services & Us  /  Tags: , , ,   /   1 Comment

Utah Mechanics Liens Are Assignable

Filing a mechanic’s lien in any state is fairly inexpensive and easy to do.   Legal Document Preparation services like Zlien, for example, perform the task for just $295.00.

While the filing of a mechanic’s lien is effective in and of itself, at times the filing of a lien alone is not enough to get your company paid.   And every state’s laws require that within some period of time, your business move it or lose it.   In other words, you’re required to “enforce” or “perfect” your lien.

In the construction business, cash can be tight.  One option contractors, subs and suppliers might want to consider in these instances is assigning your lien rights to a third party.

Whether lien rights are assignable interests is something that varies state-by-state.  However, a construction attorney in Utah – Randy Birch – just published an article on his Construction & Collections Blog about the assignability of lien rights in that state.

The verdict:  You Can.

Here is a quote from his recently posted article:

Utah Code section 38-1-26 specifically makes mechanic’s lien rights assignable by stating that “All Liens under this chapter shall be assignable as other chooses in action, and the assignee may commence and prosecute actions thereon in his own name in the manner herein provided.” Utah Code Ann. § 38-1-26 (Lexis 2005); see also Elwell v. Morrow, 28 Utah 278, 78 P. 605 (1904).

The right to perfect a lien is also assignable under section 38-1-26.

Read the full article by clicking here.

Posted in:     Mechanic Liens  /  Tags: , , , , , , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

Mechanic’s Lien Solution

  • The most potent tool you have to manage receivables is to preserve, perfect and enforce your mechanics lien and bond claim rights. But, it's so complex? Zlien is a revolutionary enterprise offering to monitor your lien deadlines and automatically file required documents.

Contact Zlien

  • 4819 Prytania Street
    New Orleans, LA 70115
    (866) 720-5436
    email: mail@zlien.com