Posts Tagged ‘Michigan Construction Law Update’

Michigan Lien Priority Case – Another Battle Between Mortgage and Mechanic Lien

Lien Priority disputes are always the same: a property is foreclosed, there’s not enough money to go around, and the mortgagor and lien claimant fights about whose claim is superior to the other. Whenever we hear about a new lien priority case, we post about it under the Lien Priority tag (click on it to read).

A recent post from the Michigan Construction Law Update blog called our attention to a lien priority case out of that state. The Michigan Court of Appeals held in First Community Bank v. Montainaire, LLC, et al that a construction lien has priority over a mortgage regardless of whether the general contractor and project owner’s changed during the course of the project.

The general rules about lien priority in Michigan is summarized by the court in Montainaire with the following:

Construction liens have priority over interests that are recorded “subsequent to the first actual physical improvement.” MCL 570.1119(3). However, a “mortgage, lien, encumbrance, or other interest recorded before the first actual physical improvement to real property shall have priority over a construction lien arising under this act.” MCL 570.1119(4)

The peculiar circumstance in the Montainaire case, however, was that the construction project sort of stopped and started up again, or at least there was a change in the general contractor and a second notice of commencement filed. The mortgagee argued that the mechanic lien priority traced back to the time of the second notice of commencement’s filing, and not back to when the project originally began. The court held contrary to the mortgagee:

We believe that the statutory language does not support First Community’s argument that a new project (with new priorities) began when Pioneer filed a second notice of commencement in 2005. Rather, under MCL 570.1119(3) and (4), priority depends on when the mortgage was recorded with respect to the “first actual physical improvement.” MCL 570.1103(1) defines an “actual physical improvement” as “the actual physical change in, or alteration of, real property as a result of labor provided, pursuant to a contract, by a contractor, subcontractor, or laborer which is readily visible and of a kind that would alert a person upon reasonable inspection of the existence of an improvement.” (Emphasis added.) A notice of commencement is not mentioned.

Posted in:     Lien Law Alerts, Mechanic Liens  /  Tags: , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

Michigan Lien Recovery Fund Raises White Flag

Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC’s Michigan Construction Law Update posted an troubling blog post just before the end of the year concerning the Michigan Lien Recovery Fund.

In plain language, the Michigan Lien Recovery Fund is a self-sustaining fund that steps in and pays lien claims on residential properties.   A homeowner can avoid paying for work twice by dumping claimants to the fund, and claimants can recover money owed by seeking judgment against the fund (as opposed to the homeowner).

There are some rules, restrictions and limitations, of course (such as a $75k cap per residential structure)…but in theory, the whole thing works out.

As the turbulent 2009 comes to a close, however, there is trouble with the Michigan Lien Recovery Fund:  it’s completely out of money.

Earlier in December, the Department of Engery, Labor and Economic Growth posted this update about the status of the Fund on their website:

At the present time, the Fund has become essentially insolvent, with a declining balance and an ineffective funding source to cover pending claims. The Department is seeking to repeal the Fund through legislative action.

According to the DELEG and Michigan Construction Law Update, the lack of money is fact, and not fiction:

The Fund is currently involved in over 250 pending lawsuits involving more than 350 claims against it that total more than $18 million. In 2009, Judgments against the Fund have averaged $123,800 per month. By mid-October, there was only $524,000 remaining in Fund coffers.  (from Mich. Construction Law Update)

The Fund sought a judicial remedy to the situation, but they received an adverse ruling in court.   For the time being, everyone involved is really stuck between a rock and a hard place (homeowners are exposed, claimants don’t know where to turn, the Fund is a lame duck, etc.).

This doesn’t / won’t necessarily affect a Michigan contractor or supplier’s lien and claim rights, but it certainly implicates the method of foreclosing upon claims.  Stay tuned.

Posted in:     Lien Law Alerts  /  Tags: , , ,   /   1 Comment

Mechanic’s Lien Solution

  • The most potent tool you have to manage receivables is to preserve, perfect and enforce your mechanics lien and bond claim rights. But, it's so complex? Zlien is a revolutionary enterprise offering to monitor your lien deadlines and automatically file required documents.

Contact Zlien

  • 4819 Prytania Street
    New Orleans, LA 70115
    (866) 720-5436
    email: mail@zlien.com