Christopher Hill Launches Great Resource for Virginia Mechanic Liens
Our friend at Construction Law Musings, Virginia construction attorney Christopher Hill, just add a really great resource to his top-notch construction law blog for those interested in construction liens. A Mechanic’s Lien Page.
Before the lien page, Musings was already a great source of information on Virginia lien laws. The new page really organizes that data.
Here are a few of the articles you can find within the new section:
A Lien By Any Other Name Can Sound Just As Sweet (written by yours truly)
Q: What can you lien? A: What did you bring to the project?
Enjoy.
(P.S. If you’re looking for information on Virginia’s lien scheme right here at the Construction Lien Blog, you can just check out our Virginia tag. It even includes a post by Chris Hill).
Scott Wolfe Contributes Guest Post on Construction Law Musings
Big thank you to our friend Christopher Hill who operates the Construction Law Musings blog for allowing me to become his blog’s first three-time Guest Post Friday writer.
This morning, Musing’s published a blog post I wrote titled “A Lien By Any Other Name Can Sound Just As Sweet.”
The article provides readers with a broad overview of the lien-like remedies available to them, as they differ based upon the classes of projects. In large part, the article explains the difference between a traditional lien (filed against the property on private projects) and a “claim” type of lien (filed against a bond on a state and federal project).
Of course, this post only skims the surface, but sometimes, it’s the basic information that is needed to help folks understand the details. And why is it important to understand these details? The article on Musings concludes with that answer as follows:
Regardless of what class of project you’re working on, a lien-like remedy is probably available to you in the event of non-payment. However, it’s critical to understand the different remedies available at the onset of construction, for each remedy carries different pre-lien or pre-claim requirements.
Take a look at the article by clicking him, and be sure to subscribe to Christopher’s blog which posts great information relevant to those in the construction industry.
Vote For Construction Lien Blog As Best Construction Blog
The good folks at ConstructionMarketingIdeas.com are holding a Best Construction Blog Competition, and the Construction Lien Blog has been nominated.
If you’re a fan of what we do here, we’d appreciate you visiting this page and casting your vote for us. You can also vote for our friends the Construction Law Monitor and Construction Law Musings. They are just above us on the list.
As usual, thanks for reading!
Open Accounts and Mechanics Liens
The following post was written by a guest contributor to the Construction Lien Blog, Christopher Hill. Chris a construction attorney in the state of Virginia, leading the construction practice group at Durrette Bradshaw. He publishes a construction law blog titled “Construction Law Musings.” [Chris' profile at Construction Lien Blog]
Scott Wolfe, one of the contributors to this blog asked me for a piece on Virginia Mechanic’s Liens. Scott has written several good pieces on liens in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and I hope that this one proves as helpful.
In researching liens in the Commonwealth of Virginia, I ran across a question that should be on the minds of construction professionals in Virginia, particularly suppliers of materials. The question is simply “On an open account (based on a credit agreement or other arrangement), is each delivery to a particular contractor its own “work” such that the 90 day clock runs from the completion of each delivery, or do all deliveries to a particular project constitute the “work” on that project such that the 90 day clock only runs from the last delivery to the job site?” (How’s that for simple!)
The answer to this question is (drum roll please!)- “It depends.” (I know, you are shocked at such a “lawyerly” answer.)
The Virginia Supreme Court weighed in on this question in United Savings Association of Texas, F. S. B. v. Jim Carpenter Company, Record No. 951470 (2006). The Jim Carpenter case involved three different cases of liens that were filed by material men pursuant to various forms of open account contracts. You can read the case to see the particular facts of the case but in essence the owners/general contractors on the project argued that the material men could not lien for any materials delivered to a particular project outside of the 90 day lien window and the material men argued that all of the materials were delivered to the same projects and therefore all constituted one continuous contract.
The Virginia Supreme Court held that the intent of the parties controls. On the one hand, general deliveries to a contractor for general use (i. e. warehousing for use at some time in the future) each constitute a separate contract, each with its own 90 day clock. On the other, if the material deliveries upon which the lien is based are all delivered for the benefit of a particular project then they all constitute one continuous contract and the 90 day clock does not start to run until the last delivery is completed.
What do you, as a construction professional, take from this case? Be careful with your open accounts. Make sure that when delivering materials to a job site based upon an open account you are exceedingly clear with your purchase order or takeoff language that certain materials are to be delivered to a certain project. Failure to do so may lead a court to decide that the materials were a general delivery and cut off much or all of your recovery.
As with everything else to do with the picky issues with mechanic’s liens, all of the other requirements (150 day look back, notice, etc.) apply and good legal assistance is a must.
If you are interested in more thoughts on Virginia construction law, please check out my Construction Law Musings blog and join the conversation.
