January 12, 2010

Don’t Know Who Bonded A State Or Federal Project? Just ask.

In nearly every circumstance, a general contractor on a federal or state project is required to maintain a bond for the work being performed.   These bonds protect the payment rights of subcontractors, sub-subcontractors and suppliers.    In the event any of these parties are not paid on the project, the unpaid party can typically file a claim against the surety who bonds the project as per the Miller Act or a state’s Little Miller Act.  (Read this great article from Construction Business Owner about bonds, generally).

Claims against sureties are beneficial because:  (1) It can reduce the prevalence of personality conflicts between the unpaid party and the general contractor; and (2) It is a guarantee that at the end of a proceeding, money will be there.

However, you can’t make a claim against a surety if you don’t know who the surety is.   And if you’re not on the best of a terms with a general contractor, you may fear that it won’t reveal the surety to you.

So, this begs the question:  how on earth do you discover the identity of a surety?

The answer is quite simple:  Just ask.  That’s right, just ask for it.

Who To Ask?

Under the Miller Act and most Little Miller Act statutes, the public agency in charge of the project is required to (and quite used to) disclose the identity of the surety to anyone who asks for it.

Using Google, you can generally always find the governing authority.   A governing authority will typically manage its contracts through:

(a) public works department;
(b) new construction department;
(c) purchasing department;
(d) capital projects department; or
(e) facilities department

Most of these governing authorities (almost all) will have a website that gives you some information about their public contracts.   Figuring out which department is in charge of the contract is generally a toss up, so you will likely need to navigate around government websites to find the best possible contact.

How to Ask

As I stated above, agencies are required to disclose the surety on the job….actually getting it, just depends on how difficult the agency will make it for you.

If a governing authority has a website, you will generally be able to find out at least a little bit of information about their projects. If the project is relatively new, they might still have bid postings, pictures, articles and reports posted.

Giving the agency a phone call will usually do the trick, but if you run into trouble, just send a certified letter making the request.  You can even have Express Lien send this notice / request for you.   We’ll even figure out who to contact, saving your company valuable time and energy.


September 6, 2009

If A Construction Lien is Bonded…Does that Circumvent Payment to an Claimant?

Typically, a construction lien is filed to have a number of desired effects:  (1) To prevent the sale or transfer of the property; (2) To hold multiple parties without contractual privity liable for the debt; and (3) To provide contractors with a faster and more direct remedy against parties in litigation.

But if a homeowner (or other interested party) files a bond in response to the lien, does that defeat the purposes of the lien itself?

Quite simply, no.

What is a lien bond?

Most mechanic liens statutes give property owners and other interested parties in a construction project the ability to file a bond in response to a party’s filing of a mechanic’s lien.   Most states require the amount of the bond to equal more than 100% the lien claim.

In Louisiana, for example, a lien bond must be 125% the amount of a claim.   In Washington, the bond must be 150% the claim amount.

The bond itself is deposited with the recorder or clerk’s office and theoretically “takes the place” of the lien. A filed bond, therefore, usually has the effect of eliminating any barriers to the sale or transfer of property and nullifying any rights to sue parties without contractual privity.

So, if a lien can be bonded and all of the lien’s benefits nullified…what’s the point of the lien?

The Bond’s Benefits

While the lien bond acts to nullify some positive aspects of a party’s claim of lien, it does not defeat the purpose of the lien statutes.   The claimant loses some benefits of the lien itself, but it gains the benefits of the bond.

Here are some benefits of the bond:

  • The entire amount in dispute (plus an additional amount – 25%, 50%, etc.) is filed with the court, and is securely awaiting determination of ownership.   This means that upon a court award, you won’t have to spend any money “collecting” the judgment.   The money is there.
  • The lawsuit to foreclose or enforce your lien becomes a lot less complicated.   Sometimes, a subcontractor’s lien claim can include a handful of parties (owners, GCs, suppliers, etc.).   The more parties in litigation, the more expense and procedural hurdles.   When a lien is bonded, it reduces the litigation to a one-on-one dispute and narrows the scope (and expense) of the action.

In short, while a bonded lien does not prevent the sale or transfer of property and may reduce the number of parties a claimant can sue….the bond also eliminates the need for those remedies.  It places the entire amount in dispute (plus sum) into the reach of the claimant, and the claimant can move forward in a clean and uncomplicated procedural action to recover the funds.

If your lien is bonded, it has already succeeded to some degree (it has produced the cash).  Now, it’s only a matter of proving that the cash is yours.