Posts Tagged ‘Bond Claims’

Why You Can’t File A Mechanics Lien On A State or County Project

Why You Can’t File A Mechanics Lien On A State or County ProjectIn this State Bond Claim Series, we’ve talked about the lien-like remedy available to contractors and suppliers on federal, state or county projects. While many folks believe they can file a mechanics lien on a state or county project, they are incorrect.  The traditional mechanics lien remedy – where you file a privilege against an actual piece of property – is not available on state and county projects. Instead, as we’ve been exploring in the blog series, those unpaid for work or materials furnished to a state or county construction project may file a bond claim.

These are commonly referred to in the industry as “liens” or “mechanics liens,” but they are actually not lien filings. Instead of a “lien” filing a claim against the property itself, a “claim” is filed against the project’s payment bond.

Since the mechanics lien term is used so heavily in the construction industry (thus leading people to assume they can file a mechanics lien on a state or county project), one must wonder: why can’t you file a mechanics lien on a state project?

The answer is quite simple, and it’s that the state, local and federal governments are not going to risk losing its title to property. There are no scenarios in the law that allows a private company or private person to acquire an encumbrance against state property.  Plus, if we go back to the original purpose behind the mechanics lien instrument, it was to provide protection to builders and suppliers who were furnishing to private projects because the private credit markets were so poor in the 1800s.  There was never any significant problems with the US or state governments not having the funds to complete capital improvements.  Over time, to protect builders and suppliers from contractors who misapply construction funds, the governments created bond claim laws to act a lot like mechanics lien laws.

Tags: , , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

Why Bond Claims Can Be Better Than Mechanic Lien Claims

It’s surprising how often I encounter disappointment when I explain that a traditional mechanic’s lien cannot be filed against a state, county or federal project. The terms “mechanic’s lien” and “lien” get thrown around so much in the construction industry, that they’ve acquired a mystic existence.  If there aren’t “lien rights,” disappointment ensues.

As I’ve explained in the past, there are never traditional mechanic lien rights on state, county or federal projects. And sometimes (such as in the state of Florida), lien rights on private projects are eliminated by the posting of a payment bond. However, while payment bonds eliminate traditional mechanic lien rights, that’s not a reason to get upset. In many ways, payment bond claims are preferable to a traditional mechanics lien claim.

Surety Bonds Are Rarely “Over-Mortgaged”

If you aren’t paid on a private construction project and file a mechanic’s lien, things can go fantastically, and most frequently do go fantastically.  The mechanics lien is an awesome remedy and usually results in getting contractors and suppliers paid. However, there are some circumstances when a contractor, property owner and/or project goes completely belly up, which leaves mechanic lien claimants to fight amongst themselves (and with mortgages and construction lenders) over how the value of the property will be split between them.

If a property has $100,000 of equity and $500,000 of claims…well, you can do the math.

This problem very, very, very rarely happens with surety and payment bonds. In most cases, payment bonds must be posted in an amount equal to the contract amount.  Thus, there is very rarely a situation when the amounts due to contractors and suppliers exceed the value of the bond.  As a result, the bond claim is actually more secure, because it’s virtually guaranteed that the money will be there.  No selling of hte property and competing with other lien claims required – just make the claim, and that’s that.

The Claims Process Can Be Quite Smooth

There are always exceptions, but filing a bond claim can turn out to be a pretty good experience. The bonding company is going to review your claim and the backup materials and make a determination about the validity of your claim. There are many occassions when the bonding company determines your claim is valid, and pays it.

The result of this is that your claim gets an “independent” decision pretty early.  If the bonding company refuses to make payment and denies the claim, you can still file a lawsuit to enforce your claim and force payment.  As such, the bonding company’s decision is not final.  However, it is a benefit to have the bonding company review your claim and potentially pay it.  This type of experience never happens with a traditional mechanic’s lien claim, however, and so there is never a similar opportunity like this to get paid and avoid litigation.

Tags: , ,   /   Leave a comment

Good Practice: Get A Copy Of The Payment Bond On State Projects

When working on a state (or federal) construction project, the payment bond is key. If you’re unpaid for labor or materials furnished to a state or federal construction project, you’re entitled to file a claim against the payment bond.  This works exactly like a traditional mechanic’s lien claim, except that instead of filing your claim against the property itself, you’re filing a claim against the payment bond, which stands in place of the property.

The payment bond becomes the center of the universe when payment problems arise on public construction projects, and so it’s surprising how many project participants work on these projects without the payment bond in-hand.

You’re Entitled To A Copy Of The Payment Bond

Remember this statement: You are entitled to a copy of the payment bond.  No ands, ifs or buts about this. On construction projects in nearly every state and county, if the project is a public work, the state laws provide that you must be provided a copy of the payment bond upon request.  You’re usually allowed to request it from either the prime contractor or the public entity commissioning the work.

While some state statutes restrict who can request a copy of the payment bond, not all states offer such protection. Consider the statute in New York’s Little Miller Act, for example, which opens the payment bond for inspection to the public:

A copy of such payment bond shall be kept in the office of the head of the department or bureau having charge of the public improvement in connection with which the bond was given and a copy shall also be kept in the office of the comptroller or other appropriate official; such copies shall be open to public inspection.

How To Get A Copy Of The Payment Bond

Now that you know you’re entitled to a copy of the payment bond, you may be wondering: how do I get it?

Each state has slightly different procedures for requesting a copy of payment bonds, but in general, a formal written request is required from the party who is providing labor and/or materials to the applicable project.  These requests are typically sent to the prime contractor or the public entity commissioning the work, and they are sent by certified mail or certified mail with return receipt requested.  In a minority of cases, the requesting party must actually provide a notarized affidavit affirming that they are furnishing to the project.

In states where preliminary notices are required on state construction projects, it’s a good practice to actually include this request within that notice.  Whenever a preliminary notice is ordered from Zlien, we have that formal request for information built into the notice form.  This ensures that the potential lien claimant gets a copy of the payment bond at the very start of construction.

Why It’s Important To Get A Copy Of The Payment Bond

There are two primary reasons why it’s important to have a copy of the payment bond on a state or county public works project:  (1) It identifies the bonding company for you; and (2) It identifies the terms of the bond.

First, knowing who the bonding company is can be critical to making a timely bond claim. In many states, you’re required to deliver your bond claim to the bonding company within a certain period of time. It’s obvious that you can’t send the claim to this party if you don’t know who they are. If you wait to investigate the identity of a surety just before a bond claim deadline, when tempers may be a bit more uncontrolled because of payment problems at the project, you may be left with a tall order – which, unfortunately, can impact your ability to make a claim.

Second, getting a copy of the payment bond discloses to you the terms of that bond.  I just yesterday posted an article about why the terms of a payment bond are important. In addition to my article, consider this great post at the Legal Construction Zone Blog operated by Jennifer Watt:  Some Dos and Don’ts For Making A Claim Against A Surety Bond. Her Do #1: Read the Bond.  Good advice.

Tags: , , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

What If State Law Conflicts With Provisions Of The Construction Bond?

We frequently discuss bond claims on this blog, as this is the mechanics lien remedy available to contractors and suppliers on state and federal projects. When working on a project owned by or controlled by the government, those unpaid for services rendered are able to file a claim against a payment bond, as opposed to liening the property itself.

In the past, I’ve always focused on the laws governing these payment bond claims, as the federal government and each state government have such laws. However, there is another layer to these claims, and that’s the terms of the payment bond claim itself.  This post explains why these terms exist and when they matter.

Did You Realize Payment Bonds Have Contractual Terms?

Payment bonds always have legal terms. Many potential bond claimants overlook this because there is so much focus on the state or federal rules governing the bond claim, but nevertheless, they exist, and there are a handful of situations that can arise when your bond claim is compromised because of a failure to comply with the terms of the bond.

It’s important, therefore, to get a copy of the payment bond as soon as possible. We’ve written about how you can obtain a copy of the surety bond in the past.  It’s a very easy process: just ask for it.

Once you get a copy, it’s important to review it, and make note of your potential obligations under the bond in making a claim. These bonding companies are – at heart – insurance companies, and if you’ve ever dealt with an insurance company you know that getting a claim paid is sometimes more about complying with the policy’s technical provisions than having an actual worthwhile claim. This is true for payment bonds as well. Proceed with care.

When Payment Bond Terms and State or Federal Law Conflicts

Now, let’s get to the heart of this post. Let’s say you have made your claim in perfect compliance with state or federal laws (by sending any required notices and making any required claims, on time).  What happens if the terms of a payment bond conflict with the state or federal laws? Which prevails?

The overwhelming majority answer to this question is that the legal standards prevail.  Under the US Miller Act, and most state Little Miller Acts, any provisions within a payment bond that conflict with the legal requirements are rendered null and void.  As such, sticking to the state or federal legal requirements is a pretty safe practice.

Realize that this general rule does not negate the payment bond terms that do not conflict with federal or state law. Those terms remain valid, which loops you back to the start of this post and the lesson: get the bond and read it.

However, just like anything in the mechanics lien and payment bond world, there are always exceptions. Here are two example exceptions.

Kentucky

Most states require bond claims to be foreclosed upon within a certain time period – the statutory period.  If the statute in that state requires bond claim foreclosures within 1 or 2 years, any provision within a payment bond requiring foreclosure in a shorter time will be rendered null and void, as conflicting with state or federal law.

This is not the case in Kentucky, which bucks the trend in two ways.

First, it does not establish a specific time period to file a bond claim foreclosure action. Therefore, the general rule is that payment bond claimants have 15 years to file a lawsuit to enforce their bond claims, which is the general statutory limitations period.

Second, however, Kentucky does not prohibit a payment bond from restricting the time period to enforce a payment bond claim by the terms of the bond. Bond claimants, therefore, ought to be very cautious in Kentucky.  If the bond’s terms require a foreclosure in 6 months, 1 year, or some other period, the bond claimant must comply with that time period to enforce its claim.

Read the full text of the Kentucky Little Miller Act.

Rhode Island

Rhode Island has virtually the very same exception, only in reverse. In Rhode Island the payment bond terms cannot make the foreclosure period shorter, but it can make it longer. The statute in question is Rhode Island Statute § 37-12-5, which specifically provides a standard foreclosure period of 2 years and authorizes a payment bond to include terms that alters (in favor of the claimant) this statutory period:

No suit instituted under § 37-12-2 shall be commenced after the expiration of two (2) years, or under the maximum time limit as contained within any labor or material payment bond required under § 37-12-1, whichever period is longer, after the day on which the last of the labor was furnished or performed or material or equipment was furnished or supplied by any person claiming under the section.

A lot of other states may actually allow such foreclosure period extensions, but Rhode Island is one of the only states (that I know of) that specifically allows for this in their statute.

Read the full text of the Rhode Island Little Miller Act.

Tags: , , , , , ,   /   1 Comment

Knowing A Project’s Final Settlement Date Is Key For State Bond Claim Deadlines

One frustrating thing about the mechanic’s lien and payment bond claim laws across the nation is that they are all different. In particular, the lien claimant’s deadline to file a mechanic’s lien or payment bond claim varies state-to-state. Since this post is part of our State Bond Claim Blog Series, it will focus on claim deadlines for state payment bond claims. However, the discussion really cross-applies to mechanic liens on private projects.

When working on a federal construction project governed by the US Miller Act, figuring out the claim deadline is simple.  Regardless of where you are it’s always the same: 90 days from last furnishing labor and materials to the project. Not only is the lien claim consistent across all projects, but it’s easy to determine. Every lien claimant knows when they last furnished to a project, so calculating the deadline simply requires you add 90 days to that.

Some states follow the Miller Act and require state payment bond claims to be filed within a certain number of days from last furnishing labor and/or materials (usually 90). However, it’s a mistake to assume this is the case, as there are a lot of states that take a completely different and more difficult approach: to require the claim be filed within a certain time period after acceptance of the entire public work.

Why It’s Important To Know A Project’s Final Settlement Date To File A State Payment Bond Claim

Some states require payment bond claims be filed within a certain time period after the public project is finally accepted by the public body commissioning the work. If you don’t know when this final acceptance date is, therefore, you may miss the payment bond claim deadline and file a tardy claim.

That means it is important to know two key pieces of information:

  1. What exact day starts the clock; and
  2. When that day is.

Let me explain.

For the first piece of information – what day starts the clock – you should understand that each state adopting this “from completion” deadline actually adopts it in their own unique way. In some states, the deadline counts from the public body’s final acceptance of the project, while in other states it may start from final completion, substantial completion or just “completion.”

For the second piece of information – knowing when that day is – knowing what circumstance starts the day counting, and the court interpretations of what indicates the happening of that circumstance, can be key when you’re crunching days to fit your payment bond claim in the statutory limits. Ask yourself these questions:  What if warranty work or punch list work is still being performed, does that mean the project is not complete? Is the project accepted when a public body accepts the work orally or in a letter, or is a formal filing required?

What Suppliers and Subcontractors Should Do If They Don’t Know When A Project is Completed

I’ll be honest with you – I hate the states that require mechanic lien or payment bond claim filings within a certain period of time from when the entire project is completed. While there are theorical arguments favorable to the structure, it just doesn’t work on a practical level because so many laborers, subcontractors and suppliers never know when the project is actually completed.  This has two consequences: (1) Those with lien claims lose their rights without knowing it, and without any way of knowing it; (2) Claimants file liens late because they just have no idea whether it will be timely or not.

Hate it as much as I want, the framework exists in multiple states on both state and private works. Therefore, let me give you four best practices to manage these lien deadline types:

Count Your Deadline From Last Furnishing

The easiest and most obvious way to deal with these deadline types is to simply ignore them, and to calculate your payment bond claim deadline from the last date of your furnishing to the project.  If a payment bond claim is due within 90 days from a project’s completion or acceptance, simply count 90 days from your last furnishing and consider that the deadline.

Usually, if you use the time period and calculate from your last furnishing date, the debt will be old enough to justify action. Plus, it’s important in collections to take action earlier, not later.

Calculating your deadline in this way will nearly guarantee that your payment bond claim will be timely.

Request The Project Schedule

When you’re working with a subcontractor or the prime contractor on a state construction project in one of these “from completion” states, request a copy of the project schedule at the start of your furnishing. You can look at these schedules and see the estimated substantial completion date.  You’ll want to use this date as the start of payment bond claim period.

While project delays may delay the completion of the project (and remember, the project could be abandoned), this is a pretty accurate way to calculate a fairly safe payment bond claim deadline.

Take Advantage Of State Laws That Let You Ask For Notice of Completion

Recognizing the problem contractors and suppliers face in determining a project’s completion date, some states fill in the gap by providing parties a right to request that information directly from the public entity commissioing work or the prime contractor. When this right is available, the subcontractor or supplier can deliver a notice to the public entity or prime contractor at the conclusion of their work, and this creates an obligation on the receiving party to notify the sending party at the conclusion of work.

While this sounds great, it doesn’t always work in practice because prime contractors and public entities overlook sending the notice, and the statutory remedy for breach of this obligation is less than optimal. In many cases, you cannot resurrect a tardy payment bond claim from the dead.

Look Online For Project Updates

I leave this suggestion for last because it’s probably the least usable. Nevertheless, many counties and states (especially states) have a website that is dedicated to providing updates on the state’s public works. Many of these sites provide accurate information about when the project is completed.

If you can locate a project page for the project where you’re working, it may be worth monitoring that site to figure out when the project is completed.

Tags: , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

Mechanic’s Lien Solution

  • The most potent tool you have to manage receivables is to preserve, perfect and enforce your mechanics lien and bond claim rights. But, it's so complex? Zlien is a revolutionary enterprise offering to monitor your lien deadlines and automatically file required documents.

Contact Zlien

  • 4819 Prytania Street
    New Orleans, LA 70115
    (866) 720-5436
    email: mail@zlien.com