Posts Tagged ‘20-Day Notice’

Effective Now: New California Preliminary Notice Requirement for Public Work Projects

The preliminary notice requirements on private construction projects in California are simple: if you didn’t contract directly with the property owner, you must deliver a 20-day preliminary notice within 20 days of first furnishing labor and/or materials to the project. The same rule, however, did not exactly apply to those working on state or county projects (public work projects).

While there was a preliminary notice requirement on these public work projects, if a subcontractor or supplier failed to deliver the notice, there was a safety net allowing notice at the very end of the construction project (15 days from the notice of completion recordation, or if not recorded, 75 days from completion of the project).

However, in 2011, SB 293, Padilla, amended the law to eliminate this preliminary notice safety net.

Preliminary Notice Required Every Time on California Public Works Projects

The new law in a nutshell is that everyone on a public works project in California who did not contract directly with the prime contractor must give a preliminary notice within 20-days of first furnishing labor and/or materials to the construction project. There is no longer a safety net allowing claims at the completion of construction, and therefore, those who do not properly send their preliminary notices on-time, will no longer have any rights to make a claim against the payment bond or to file a stop notice.

Preliminary Notice must be given to:  (i) The public entity; and (ii) The contractor with the direct contractual relationship with the public entity (the “direct contractor”).  There is a special additional requirement if the work was commissioned by the Department of Public Works or the Department of General Services for California, such that the notice must be given to the disbursing officer of the department construction work specifically.

The only exception to this notice requirement is that those who are 100% laborers (not laborer companies) are not required to furnish the notice. Remember also that unlike on private works, where the notice is required if you did not contract with the owner, on public works the notice is only required if you didn’t contract with the direct contractor.  This is an important difference.

When the Law Is Effective? Now!

The law can be a little confusing about which portions go into effect on January 1, 2012, and which go into effect on July 1, 2012, especially regarding the new preliminary notice requirements. However, to be safe, all affected subcontractors and suppliers should consider the new preliminary notice requirements to be fully effective as of January 1, 2012.

Also, while this post only talks about SB 293′s effect on California’s preliminary notice requirements, the bill has a longer reach.  For a quick breakdown of the bill’s full legal impact, see these two articles:  SBC approved by California Legislators and is Headed to the Governor and New Payment Rules in 2012.

Also, you can read the Full Text of the Chaptered SB 293 here.

Posted in:     Lien Law Alerts, Preliminary Notices  /  Tags: , , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

FAQ: Are There Any Exceptions to California’s Preliminary Notice Requirements?

Short answer:  Yes, there is a limited exception recognized by California Courts…but you should be very careful when relying upon it.

Long answer:  As a general rule, if you did not contract directly with the property owner on a California construction project, you must deliver a “20 Day Preliminary Notice” within 20 days of first furnishing labor and/or materials to the construction project.

Unfortunately, life happens, and sometimes your stuck unpaid on a construction project when you failed to send your preliminary notice.  And you may find yourself wondering…are there any exceptions to the rule?

If you know anything about law, you know that there are exceptions to every rule, and it’s no different with the California preliminary notice rule.  However, it’s a very, very limited exception, and you should be very careful when relying on it because whether you’re entitled to the exception or not will depend on a judge’s decision.  The judge’s decision could go either way, because if you ever get to a judge on the question, it’s certain that your position will be opposed by the property owner, and the judge will be required to decide who is lying and who is telling the truth.  Whenever a dispute comes down to this – a swearing contest – it’s bad news, and there’s a large risk of loss.

Nevertheless, an exception has been recognized in Truestone, Inc. v. SIMI West Industrial Park II, 163 Cal.App. 3d 715 (Cal. App. 2d 1984).  There, the courts held that an owner with actual knowledge of a particular party’s involvement with a construction project cannot challenge a mechanic lien based on not having notice that the particular party was on the project.  Here are the court’s words exactly:

In some cases, even where there is no contractual relationship between the parties, actual knowledge may estop the property owner from asserting the notice requirements of section 3097. The extent of the property owner’s knowledge and the time it was acquired may be a significant variable. Section 3129 establishes a presumption that all construction work performed on property with the owner’s knowledge “shall be held to have been constructed, performed, or furnished at the instance of such owner . . . .” Therefore, where a work of improvement is completed on leased land under contract with a lessee of the property, a statutory exception to the notice requirement of section 3097 applies.

“The noncontracting owner is placed in the position of a party to the contract by the conclusive presumption that the work was done at his instance and request.” ( Halspar, Inc. v. La Barthe (1965) 238 Cal.App.2d 897, 899 [48 Cal.Rptr. 293].) The lessor-owner with actual knowledge may be estopped to deny the validity of the lien because the lessee is viewed as his agent. ( M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. & Associates, Inc. v. Larry Barrett, Inc. (1972) 7 Cal.3d 695, 707 [103 Cal.Rptr. 247, 499 P.2d 503].) Similarly, the lien of a firm which supplied architectural and engineering services to real property under a contract with the original owner-developer is enforceable against the subsequent transferees of the property on an estoppel theory. ( Scott, Blake & Wynne v. Summit Ridge Estates, Inc. (1967) 251 Cal.App.2d 347 [59 Cal.Rptr. 587].)

Notice that the court says “the extent of the property owner’s knowledge and the time it was acquired may be a significant variable.”  This translates to mean the courts will have very wide dissection in determining whether the knowledge was or was not sufficient enough to forgive a lien claimant for not sending its preliminary notice.  This is a very thin exception to the preliminary notice rule…but nevertheless, an exception.

So, if you didn’t send preliminary notice, but the property owner knew you were on the project and knew you were performing work, and had that knowledge within 20 days of you first starting to furnish the labor and/or materials, you may have a chance at proceeding with your lien claim despite the defect in notice.

Posted in:     FAQs, Preliminary Notices  /  Tags: , , ,   /   Leave a comment

7 Habits of Contractors Who Lose Money…and How to Break Them

The Construction Commando’s “Contractor’s Secret Weapon” published an article with this title that described seven instances when contractors lose money on a project.  While the article was drafted to an audience of California contractors, the habits apply nationwide.

It will be to any contractors’ benefit to review this article online, access which habits apply to you, and make an effort to avoid the costly mistakes.  Any progress will help increase your bottom line.

The seven habits highlighted are:

1)    The “Gentlemen’s Agreement” – A Handshake and Your Word.   Bottom line:  Get it in writing.
2)    Using Contracts that Fall Short of the Legal Requirements.
3)    Not Getting Every Change Order in Writing.
4)    Failing to invoice immediately.
5)    Failing to serve a preliminary 20-day notice (pre-lien construction notices)
6)    Don’t Worry – They Will “Take Care of You” on the Next Job
7)    It isn’t good “customer service” to record a Mechanic’s Lien

Posted in:     Collection Laws & Tips, Mechanic Liens, Preliminary Notices  /  Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

Did You Know? Filing Preliminary Notices

Many California contractors know that they are sometimes required to sent 20-day Preliminary Notices to the property owner and general contractor to preserve their lien rights (read related article about preliminary notice requirements in California).

Did you know that you can go a step further from simply sending this notice…and actually file the notice with the county recording office?

The benefit of filing the preliminary notice with the county recorder is that the county recorder will mail to the filing party (you) a notification if and when the property owner files a notice of completion or cessation. As discussed on the Zlien blog, the filing of these documents can affect your Liening Window. Receiving notification of its filing from teh county recorder, therefore, can be an enormous asset.

While this is a great benefit, be weary of relying on the recorder completely. The law is clear that your lien period will not be extended if the recorder fails to make this mailing to you.

Zlien, Inc. delivers preliminary notices to property owners and general contractors for $35.00 per notice. We can file your prelim notice with the county recorder and request notification of any future relevant filings for an additional $75.00 per notice.

Posted in:     Preliminary Notices  /  Tags: , , ,   /   Leave a comment

California Preliminary Notice

In California, if you provide materials or labor to a construction project, you are generally allowed to lien that project in the event of non-payment. In some circumstances, however, California law requires that a claimant provide notice to certain parties to preserve its rights to lien.

This notice is commonly referred to as “Preliminary 20-day Notice,” and contrary to popular belief, the notice must be sent to the required parties before work begins, and not simply before a lien is filed.

What is Preliminary 20-Day Notice?
California Civil Code § 3097 provides that notice “means a written notice from a claimant that is given prior to the recording of a mechanic’s lien…”

The California preliminary notice requirements are similar to the requirements of other states, and they purport to serve the following general purpose: to notify the property owner that the property may be liened in the event of non-payment.

A construction lien carries severe consequences to the property owner. If a property owner pays the general contractor, and it fails to pay its subs, through a construction lien the owner may be obligated to pay twice on the project! Most states require preliminary notice to ensure that the owner is notified of who is and who is not working on his property.

The form of California’s Preliminary Notice
California statute requires that preliminary notices contain specific information. Civ. Code § 3097(c) provides that the notice must contain the following:

  • General description of the labor, service, equipment or materials furnished, or to be furnished, and an estimate of its total price;
  • Name and address of person furnishing the labor, service, etc.
  • Name of person who contracted for the purchase of that labor, service, equipment, etc.
  • Description of the jobsite sufficient for identification
  • The following statement in bold face type:
    NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER

    If bills are not paid in full for the labor, services, equipment or materials furnished or to be furnished, a mechanic’s lien leading to the loss, through court foreclosure proceedings, of all or part of your property being so improved may be placed against the property even though you have paid your contractor in full. You may wish to protect yourself against this consequence by (1) requiring your contractor to furnish a signed release by the person or firm giving you this notice before making payment to your contractor, or (2) any other method or device that is appropriate under the circumstances. Other than residential homeowners of dwellings containing fewer than five units, private project owners must notify the original contractor and any lien claimant who has provided the owner with a preliminary 20-day lien notice in accordance with Section 3097 of the Civil Code that a notice of completion or notice of cessation has been recorded within 10 days of its recordation. Notice shall be by registered mail, certified mail, or first-class mail, evidenced by a certificate of mailing. Failure to notify will extend the deadlines to record a lien.

Since these requirements are set forth by statute, and lien statutes are typically strictly construed, it is important that your preliminary notice meet the requirements of Civ. Code §3097(c).

A Free Template of a California Preliminary Notice form can be downloaded here: California Preliminary Notice Template & Proof of Service Affidavit

Who Must Provide Notice
As discussed above, not everyone is required to provide this preliminary notice. There are many circumstances when a contractor or supplier can lien a project when they have not sent preliminary notice.

The key question, therefore, is clearly this: Who must provide Preliminary Notice?

The general rule of thumb in California is that Preliminary Notice is required by anyone who is not:

  1. In direct contract with the owner; or
  2. Performing actual labor, as an employee or as part of a labor union.

In other words, if you are an actual laborer or the party who contracted directly with the owner, you need not send preliminary notice to file a lien.

Interestingly, California courts have very liberally construed the phrase “direct contract with the owner” to include other parties aside from those who actually signed the contract with the owner.

In California, any contractor or materialman is presumed to be under “direct contract” with the owner so long as the owner has actual knowledge that construction work is being performed on his property! Kim v. JF Enterprises (App 2. Dist. 1996) 50 Cal. Rptr. 2d 141, 42 Cal. App. 4th 849.

Where to Send Notice
Assuming you are required to send Preliminary Notice, the California statutes stipulate exactly who is required to receive that notice to properly preserve a contractor or supplier’s lien rights.

The Preliminary Notice should be sent to:

  • The Owner (or reputed owner);
  • The Original Contractor (or reputed original contractor); and
  • The construction lender, if any.

When to Send Notice
Perhaps the most important question about preliminary notice in California concerns when the statutes require that notice be delivered by a contractor or supplier.

In California, notice must be given not later than 20 days after the claimant has first furnished labor, services, equipment or materials to the jobsite.

After the expiration of these 20 days, the claimant may still send notice, but it will only be effective as to the labor, services and materials supplied or provided within 20 days prior to the service of the notice (and thereafter).

Therefore, if you are required to provide preliminary notice under California statutes, it’s imperative that you deliver the notice as soon as practical. Waiting until 20 days after you begin work will jeopardize your rights to lien for unpaid work.

How to Send Notice
California statutes specifically provide a method for sending notice to the receiving parties.

The notice can be sent by delivering the document personally, by leaving it at the residence or place of business of the party with some person in charge, or by registered or certified first-class mail.

If the owner is out of state and the above-methods do not work, you can send the owner’s notice via certified or registered mail to the construction lender or original contractor.

It is important to keep good records of delivery, as the statutes also provide a specific method to prove the preliminary notice was delivered. According to §3097.1, proving delivery of preliminary notice must be as follows:

  • If served by mail, by proof of service affidavit accompanied by return receipt card or a photocopy of the record of delivery;
  • If served personally, by proof of service affidavit.

A proof of service affidavit is an affidavit by the person making service (the person who hand delivered the notice or mailed the notice). It should state the time, place and manner of service and the facts showing that the delivery was made in accordance with statutes.


Posted in:     Preliminary Notices  /  Tags: , , , ,   /   6 Comments

Mechanic’s Lien Solution

  • The most potent tool you have to manage receivables is to preserve, perfect and enforce your mechanics lien and bond claim rights. But, it's so complex? Zlien is a revolutionary enterprise offering to monitor your lien deadlines and automatically file required documents.

Contact Zlien

  • 4819 Prytania Street
    New Orleans, LA 70115
    (866) 720-5436
    email: mail@zlien.com