<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Risks of Litigating a Washington Construction Lien</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constructionlienblog.com/2009/12/the-risks-of-litigating-a-washington-construction-lien/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constructionlienblog.com/2009/12/the-risks-of-litigating-a-washington-construction-lien/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:08:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Appeals Case Confirms Lien Requirements Are Technical, But Fighting Liens Risky &#124; Construction Law Monitor</title>
		<link>http://constructionlienblog.com/2009/12/the-risks-of-litigating-a-washington-construction-lien/comment-page-1/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Appeals Case Confirms Lien Requirements Are Technical, But Fighting Liens Risky &#124; Construction Law Monitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlienblog.com/?p=1097#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>[...] Alan&#8217;s right. This decision really accentuates just how technical lien statutes are in Washington. More interesting to me, however, was the decision to award the loser of the suit attorneys fees, which accentuates how risky it is to litigate the validity of a Washington construction lien. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alan&#8217;s right. This decision really accentuates just how technical lien statutes are in Washington. More interesting to me, however, was the decision to award the loser of the suit attorneys fees, which accentuates how risky it is to litigate the validity of a Washington construction lien. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Appeals Case Confirms Lien Requirements Are Technical, But Fighting Liens Risky &#124; Northwest Construction Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://constructionlienblog.com/2009/12/the-risks-of-litigating-a-washington-construction-lien/comment-page-1/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Appeals Case Confirms Lien Requirements Are Technical, But Fighting Liens Risky &#124; Northwest Construction Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlienblog.com/?p=1097#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>[...] Alan&#8217;s right. This decision really accentuates just how technical lien statutes are in Washington. More interesting to me, however, was the decision to award the loser of the suit attorneys fees, which accentuates how risky it is to litigate the validity of a Washington construction lien. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alan&#8217;s right. This decision really accentuates just how technical lien statutes are in Washington. More interesting to me, however, was the decision to award the loser of the suit attorneys fees, which accentuates how risky it is to litigate the validity of a Washington construction lien. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Appeals Case Confirms Lien Requirements Are Technical, But Fighting Liens Risky &#124; Construction &#38; Mechanics Lien Blog</title>
		<link>http://constructionlienblog.com/2009/12/the-risks-of-litigating-a-washington-construction-lien/comment-page-1/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Appeals Case Confirms Lien Requirements Are Technical, But Fighting Liens Risky &#124; Construction &#38; Mechanics Lien Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlienblog.com/?p=1097#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>[...] Alan&#8217;s right.   This decision really accentuates just how technical lien statutes are in Washington.  More interesting to me, however, was the decision to award the loser of the suit attorneys fees, which accentuates how risky it is to litigate the validity of a Washington construction lien. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alan&#8217;s right.   This decision really accentuates just how technical lien statutes are in Washington.  More interesting to me, however, was the decision to award the loser of the suit attorneys fees, which accentuates how risky it is to litigate the validity of a Washington construction lien. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

